000 | 02808cam a22003498i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 21830460 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20211101122745.0 | ||
008 | 201204s2021 ilu b 001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a 2020054701 | ||
020 |
_a9780226786650 _q(paperback) |
||
040 |
_aICU/DLC _beng _erda _cIISERB |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aB805 _b.J67 2021 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a149.97 St74M _223 |
100 | 1 |
_aStorm, Jason Ānanda Josephson. _927652 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMetamodernism : _bthe future of theory _cJason Ānanda Josephson Storm. |
246 | 3 | 0 | _aFuture of theory |
260 |
_aChicago: _bThe University of Chicago Press, _c2021. |
||
300 | _axii, 360 pages cm | ||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 | _aOpening -- Part I. Metarealism. How the real world became a fable, or, The realities of social construction -- Part II. Process social ontology. Concepts in disintegration & strategies for demolition ; Process social ontology ; Social kinds -- Part III. Hylosemiotics. Hylosemiotics : the discourse of things -- Part IV. Knowledge and value. Zetetic knowledge ; The revaluation of values -- Conclusion : becoming metamodern. | |
520 | _a"For decades, scholars have been calling into question the universality of disciplinary objects and categories. The decay of master narratives showcases a distrust of universals, while deepening particularity seems to promise nothing but further dissolution. For Jason Josephson-Storm, these are dead ends. He wants to offer a path forward, which he terms metamodernism. This is the first full-length work to line up the various critiques of disciplinary master-categories (religion, science, art, etc.) and trace their affinities and shared conceptual roots. It suggests that if these critiques are granted, they tell us something fundamental about the mechanisms through which concepts and social categories are produced and maintained. They suggest that the social world should be seen in terms of a "process social ontology" with temporary zones of stability called "social kinds." This amounts to a new theory of society and a new methodology for research in the human sciences. The work also broadens to fundamental issues of the relationship between knowledge and value, promoting not skepticism but zeteticism--a stance directed toward humble, emancipatory knowledge. Valuing this form of knowledge allows postmodernism to be channeled into a critical virtue ethics directed toward multi-species"-- | ||
650 | 0 |
_aPhilosophy, Modern _y21st century. _927653 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aPost-postmodernism. _927654 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aPostmodernism. _927655 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aSocial sciences _xPhilosophy. _927656 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aOntology. _927657 |
|
906 |
_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cBK |
||
999 |
_c9659 _d9659 |